From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@math.leidenuniv.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 15:41:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jefzripq3q.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030123221858.GA8581@bjl1.asuk.net> (Jamie Lokier's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:18:58 +0000")
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> writes:
|> (Davide), IMHO epoll should decide whether it means "at minimum" (in
|> which case the +1 is a requirement), or it means "at maximum" (in
|> which case rounding up is wrong).
Since Linux isn't a RTOS you can't meet "at maximum". POSIX says "poll ()
shall wait at least timeout milliseconds"
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-24 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-22 6:55 {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout Lennert Buytenhek
2003-01-22 8:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-22 12:46 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-01-22 13:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-22 19:14 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-22 19:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-22 19:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-23 14:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-01-23 15:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-23 17:27 ` Mark Mielke
2003-01-23 18:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-23 20:40 ` Mark Mielke
2003-01-23 22:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-24 14:41 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2003-01-25 1:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-01-27 21:27 ` bug in select() (was Re: {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout) Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2003-01-27 22:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-01-28 9:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-28 10:52 ` Mark Mielke
2003-01-28 21:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-28 22:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-01-28 19:42 ` {sys_,/dev/}epoll waiting timeout Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-28 21:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-28 21:44 ` David Mosberger
[not found] <20030122080322.GB3466@bjl1.asuk.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0301281139570.30636-100000@dragon.pdx.osdl.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030128213621.GA29036@bjl1.asuk.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-01-28 21:55 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-28 22:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-01-28 22:39 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-28 23:00 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jefzripq3q.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=buytenh@math.leidenuniv.nl \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox