public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}
Date: 21 Nov 2001 15:59:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jelmh09nkt.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1011121085737.21389A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1011121085737.21389A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> ("Richard B. Johnson"'s message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:12:56 -0500 (EST)")

"Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> writes:

|> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Jan Hudec wrote:
|> 
|> > > >     *a++ = byte_rev[*a]
|> > > It looks perferctly okay to me. Anyway, whenever would you listen to a
|> > > C++ book talking about good C coding :p
|> > 
|> 
|> It's simple. If any object is modified twice without an intervening
|> sequence point, the results are undefined. The sequence-point in
|> 
|> 	*a++ = byte_rev[*a];
|> 
|> ... is the ';'.
|> 
|> So, we look at 'a' and see if it's modified twice.

No, the rule much stricter. 

         -- Between two sequence points, an object is modified more
            than once, or  is  modified  and  the  prior  value  is
            accessed other than to determine the value to be stored
            (6.5).

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de				completely different."
SuSE Labs, SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-21 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-21 12:40 [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {} vda
2001-11-21 11:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 11:16 ` Tim Waugh
2001-11-21 12:31 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-11-21 13:40   ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 14:19     ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 14:52       ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 18:23     ` Neil Booth
2001-11-21 12:35 ` Vincent Sweeney
2001-11-21 13:37   ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 13:52     ` Mathijs Mohlmann
2001-11-21 17:12       ` vda
2001-11-26 20:28         ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27 18:03           ` vda
2001-11-27 18:38             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-28 13:19               ` vda
2001-11-21 14:12     ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-21 14:33       ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-11-21 14:56       ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 14:59       ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2001-11-21 15:48         ` Momchil Velikov
2001-11-21 16:52       ` vda
2001-11-21 14:24     ` Sean Hunter
2001-11-21 14:25   ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-22 20:43   ` Chris Gray
2001-11-22  4:24 ` Stevie O
2001-11-22 11:46   ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-22 12:03     ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-22 20:08   ` J.A. Magallon
     [not found]     ` <01112311540300.00886@manta>
2001-11-23 14:43       ` J.A. Magallon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-27 19:03 Nathan Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jelmh09nkt.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
    --to=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox