public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for task wakeup
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 21:20:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj1rh6yygz.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021150335.1103231-1-aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>


On 21/10/20 16:03, Aubrey Li wrote:
> From: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
>
> Added idle cpumask to track idle cpus in sched domain. When a CPU
> enters idle, its corresponding bit in the idle cpumask will be set,
> and when the CPU exits idle, its bit will be cleared.
>
> When a task wakes up to select an idle cpu, scanning idle cpumask
> has low cost than scanning all the cpus in last level cache domain,
> especially when the system is heavily loaded.
>

FWIW I gave this a spin on my arm64 desktop (Ampere eMAG, 32 core). I get
some barely noticeable (AIUI not statistically significant for bench sched)
changes for 100 iterations of:

| bench                              | metric   |   mean |     std |    q90 |    q99 |
|------------------------------------+----------+--------+---------+--------+--------|
| hackbench --loops 5000 --groups 1  | duration | -1.07% |  -2.23% | -0.88% | -0.25% |
| hackbench --loops 5000 --groups 2  | duration | -0.79% | +30.60% | -0.49% | -0.74% |
| hackbench --loops 5000 --groups 4  | duration | -0.54% |  +6.99% | -0.21% | -0.12% |
| perf bench sched pipe -T -l 100000 | ops/sec  | +1.05% |  -2.80% | -0.17% | +0.39% |

q90 & q99 being the 90th and 99th percentile.

Base was tip/sched/core at:
d8fcb81f1acf ("sched/fair: Check for idle core in wake_affine")

> v2->v3:
> - change setting idle cpumask to every idle entry, otherwise schbench
>   has a regression of 99th percentile latency.
> - change clearing idle cpumask to nohz_balancer_kick(), so updating
>   idle cpumask is ratelimited in the idle exiting path.
> - set SCHED_IDLE cpu in idle cpumask to allow it as a wakeup target.
>
> v1->v2:
> - idle cpumask is updated in the nohz routines, by initializing idle
>   cpumask with sched_domain_span(sd), nohz=off case remains the original
>   behavior.
>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-21 15:03 [RFC PATCH v3] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for task wakeup Aubrey Li
2020-11-03 19:27 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-04 11:52   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 21:22     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-06  7:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-09  6:05   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 21:20 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-11-09 13:40   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-09 15:54     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-11  8:38       ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-12 10:57 ` Qais Yousef
2020-11-12 12:12   ` Li, Aubrey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jhj1rh6yygz.mognet@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox