From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] genirq: Allow an interrupt to be marked as 'raw'
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:18:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhj7dq8ugli.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124141449.572446-3-maz@kernel.org>
Hi Marc,
On 24/11/20 14:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> @@ -680,14 +679,22 @@ int __handle_domain_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int hwirq,
> * Some hardware gives randomly wrong interrupts. Rather
> * than crashing, do something sensible.
> */
> - if (unlikely(!irq || irq >= nr_irqs)) {
> + if (unlikely(!irq || irq >= nr_irqs || !(desc = irq_to_desc(irq)))) {
> ack_bad_irq(irq);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_IRQ_RAW) &&
> + unlikely(irq_settings_is_raw(desc))) {
> + generic_handle_irq_desc(desc);
If I got the RCU bits right from what Thomas mentioned in
https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ft5q18qs.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfewnmdz.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
then we're still missing something to notify RCU in the case the IRQ hits
the idle task. All I see on our entry path is
trace_hardirqs_off();
...
irq_handler()
handle_domain_irq();
...
trace_hardirqs_on();
so we do currently rely on handle_domain_irq()'s irq_enter() + irq_exit()
for that. rcu_irq_enter() says CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG=y can detect missing
bits, but I don't get any warnings with your series on my Juno.
Now, irq_enter() gives us:
rcu_irq_enter();
irq_enter_rcu()
raise_softirq faffery;
__irq_enter()
irqtime accounting;
preempt count + lockdep; } __irq_enter_raw()
Looking at irqentry_enter() + DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC_SIMPLE(), I *think* we
would be fine with just:
rcu_irq_enter();
__irq_enter_raw();
generic_handle_irq_desc()
__irq_exit_raw();
rcu_irq_exit();
I tested that and it didn't explode (though I haven't managed to make
CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG squeal). Also please note RCU isn't my forte, so the
above may contain traces of bullcrap.
> } else {
> - generic_handle_irq(irq);
> + irq_enter();
> + generic_handle_irq_desc(desc);
> + irq_exit();
> }
>
> - irq_exit();
> +out:
> set_irq_regs(old_regs);
> return ret;
> }
[...]
> @@ -180,3 +182,16 @@ static inline bool irq_settings_is_hidden(struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_HIDDEN;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool irq_settings_is_raw(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_IRQ_RAW))
> + return desc->status_use_accessors & _IRQ_RAW;
> +
> + /*
> + * Using IRQ_RAW on architectures that don't expect it is
> + * likely to be wrong.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
Per __handle_domain_irq()'s short-circuit evaluation, this is only entered
when the above config is enabled. Perhaps a better place to check for this
would be in __irq_settings_clr_and_set().
> + return false;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 14:14 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm/arm64: Allow the rescheduling IPI to bypass irq_enter/exit Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] genirq: Add __irq_modify_status() helper to clear/set special flags Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] genirq: Allow an interrupt to be marked as 'raw' Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 16:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-12-03 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-03 15:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-05 19:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-10 15:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:28 ` Todd Kjos
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: Mark the recheduling IPI as raw interrupt Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm: " Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] genirq: Drop IRQ_HIDDEN from IRQF_MODIFY_MASK Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] genirq: Rename IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-01 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm/arm64: Allow the rescheduling IPI to bypass irq_enter/exit ito-yuichi
2021-03-01 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 6:20 ` Yuichi Ito
2021-06-18 19:30 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jhj7dq8ugli.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox