From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6338BC2D0A3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187D3207DE for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728224AbgJ2PnD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:43:03 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39606 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727842AbgJ2PnC (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:43:02 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F77931B; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2B1A3F66E; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:43:00 -0700 (PDT) References: <20201029151103.373410-1-colin.king@canonical.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3 From: Valentin Schneider To: Colin King Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] sched/debug: fix memory corruption caused by multiple small reads of flags In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:42:58 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/10/20 15:29, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> @@ -269,17 +269,17 @@ static int sd_ctl_doflags(struct ctl_table *table, int write, >> return 0; >> } >> >> - tmp = kcalloc(data_size + 1, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL); > [...] >> - tmp += *ppos; > [...] >> - kfree(tmp); > > Yeah, that's downright sloppy :( I can't remember which one it was in a > hurry, but I was "inspired" by another proc handler somewhere; I'll try to > find out if there's any issue in that one or if I really cannot shift the > blame elsewhere. Nope, blame is all mine.