From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: don't set LBF_ALL_PINNED unnecessarily
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 15:13:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jhjzh1m2j4k.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210106133419.2971-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On 06/01/21 14:34, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Setting LBF_ALL_PINNED during active load balance is only valid when there
> is only 1 running task on the rq otherwise this ends up increasing the
> balance interval whereas other tasks could migrate after the next interval
> once they become cache-cold as an example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 5428b8723e61..69a455113b10 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9759,7 +9759,8 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, busiest->curr->cpus_ptr)) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&busiest->lock,
> flags);
> - env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
> + if (busiest->nr_running == 1)
> + env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
So LBF_ALL_PINNED *can* be set if busiest->nr_running > 1, because
before we get there we have:
if (nr_running > 1) {
env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
detach_tasks(&env); // Removes LBF_ALL_PINNED if > 0 tasks can be pulled
...
}
What about following the logic used by detach_tasks() and only clear the
flag? Say something like the below. if nr_running > 1, then we'll have
gone through detach_tasks() and will have cleared the flag (if
possible).
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 04a3ce20da67..211c86ba3f5b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9623,6 +9623,8 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
env.src_rq = busiest;
ld_moved = 0;
+ /* Clear this as soon as we find a single pullable task */
+ env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
if (busiest->nr_running > 1) {
/*
* Attempt to move tasks. If find_busiest_group has found
@@ -9630,7 +9632,6 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
* still unbalanced. ld_moved simply stays zero, so it is
* correctly treated as an imbalance.
*/
- env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
env.loop_max = min(sysctl_sched_nr_migrate, busiest->nr_running);
more_balance:
@@ -9756,10 +9757,11 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, busiest->curr->cpus_ptr)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&busiest->lock,
flags);
- env.flags |= LBF_ALL_PINNED;
goto out_one_pinned;
}
+ env.flags &= ~LBF_ALL_PINNED;
+
/*
* ->active_balance synchronizes accesses to
* ->active_balance_work. Once set, it's cleared
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 13:34 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce number of active LB Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: skip idle cfs_rq Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 15:13 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-06 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: don't set LBF_ALL_PINNED unnecessarily Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-06 15:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-06 15:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 15:13 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-01-06 16:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: reduce cases for active balance Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-06 15:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-06 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jhjzh1m2j4k.mognet@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox