From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BFS CPU scheduler version 0.420 AKA "Smoking" for linux kernel 3.3.0
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:28:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jkvao0$b12$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120328135336.GA1841@fancy-poultry.org>
On 28/03/12 16:53, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 28.03.2012, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>> CFS: ALSA XRUNs in JACK.
>> BFS: much less ALSA XRUNs in JACK
>
> BFS runs on all of my machines, and I know why. But that's not the
> point here. Why do people not accept and learn from each other? I'm
> quite shure that both CFS and BFS has good and bad things, why not
> take the best from both of them and improve it further?
I totally agree. What ticks me off is people who claim that using BFS
means you must be schizophrenic, even though some of them posted
numbers. Even on servers, BFS helped people. For example, a server
running mainline was behaving badly until it was switched to BFS. The
difference was quite impressive:
http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2011/08/phoronix-revisits-bfs.html
But still, many people decide to keep the "you're imagining it"
attitude, as if they're preparing flame-bait.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-24 9:39 [ANNOUNCE] BFS CPU scheduler version 0.420 AKA "Smoking" for linux kernel 3.3.0 Con Kolivas
2012-03-24 9:53 ` Gene Heskett
2012-03-24 10:00 ` Con Kolivas
2012-03-25 2:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-03-25 2:33 ` Con Kolivas
2012-03-25 13:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-26 22:30 ` Con Kolivas
2012-03-27 5:13 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <CABqErrGaBLisO4YK5dP2O9Pv0QonZ+q9G43jm=Nf12yWVG,<1332825236.7411.54.camel@marge.simpson.net>
[not found] ` <SNT112-W24CBD78928F4DD6AFDA564A14A0@phx.gbl>
2012-03-28 3:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-03-28 5:12 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-03-28 12:39 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-03-28 13:53 ` Heinz Diehl
2012-03-28 15:28 ` Nikos Chantziaras [this message]
2012-03-28 16:44 ` Mike Galbraith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-27 20:17 Mike Blue
2012-03-27 20:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-03-27 20:52 Micheal Blue
[not found] <iIvLH-3cI-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <iIw53-3TH-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <iIL45-3H1-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <iJTsB-44L-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2012-03-28 19:39 ` Martin Rogge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='jkvao0$b12$1@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=realnc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox