From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757077AbbIYOy7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:54:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52031 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756778AbbIYOy4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:54:56 -0400 From: Bandan Das To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Wanpeng Li , Jan Kiszka , Wincy Van , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: emulate the INVVPID instruction References: <56026541.7030000@redhat.com> <5604FD7E.3060901@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:54:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5604FD7E.3060901@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:53:34 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 24/09/2015 17:45, Bandan Das wrote: >> > However, I have applied the patch to kvm/queue. Please send the changes >> > separately, and I will squash them in the existing VPID patch. >> >> Please don't do this. It's making it really difficult to review these >> patches individually :( Why not let them get some review time before >> applying them all together ? > > Ok---I did it because it makes sense to keep this patch separate from > the others. You can expose VPID even if vpid02 == vpid01 (in fact > that's what happens if KVM cannot find a vpid02) and in that case this > patch provides a valid implementation of INVVPID. > > Do you think it would help if I posted the whole kvm/queue contents a > few days before pushing it to kvm/next? Oh that would be great. Thank you! > Paolo