From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching for the L1 hypervisor
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:50:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgd1964usz.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170711193235.GE3326@potion> ("Radim \=\?utf-8\?B\?S3LEjW3DocWZ\?\= \=\?utf-8\?B\?Iidz\?\= message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:32:36 +0200")
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> writes:
> 2017-07-11 14:24-0400, Bandan Das:
>> Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> writes:
>> > If there's a triple fault, I think it's a good idea to inject it
>> > back. Basically, there's no need to take care of damage control
>> > that L1 is intentionally doing.
>> >
>> >>> + goto fail;
>> >>> + kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
>> >>> + vmcs12->ept_pointer = address;
>> >>> + kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu);
>> >>
>> >> I was thinking about something like this:
>> >>
>> >> kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
>> >> old = vmcs12->ept_pointer;
>> >> vmcs12->ept_pointer = address;
>> >> if (kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu)) {
>> >> /* pointer invalid, restore previous state */
>> >> kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT, vcpu);
>> >> vmcs12->ept_pointer = old;
>> >> kvm_mmu_reload(vcpu);
>> >> goto fail;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> The you can inherit the checks from mmu_check_root().
>>
>> Actually, thinking about this a bit more, I agree with you. Any fault
>> with a vmfunc operation should end with a vmfunc vmexit, so this
>> is a good thing to have. Thank you for this idea! :)
>
> SDM says
>
> IF tent_EPTP is not a valid EPTP value (would cause VM entry to fail
> if in EPTP) THEN VMexit;
This section here:
As noted in Section 25.5.5.2, an execution of the
EPTP-switching VM function that causes a VM exit (as specified
above), uses the basic exit reason 59, indicating “VMFUNC”.
The length of the VMFUNC instruction is saved into the
VM-exit instruction-length field. No additional VM-exit
information is provided.
Although, it adds (as specified above), from testing, any vmexit that
happens as a result of the execution of the vmfunc instruction always
has exit reason 59.
IMO, the case David pointed out comes under "as a result of the
execution of the vmfunc instruction", so I would prefer exiting
with reason 59.
> and no other mentions of a VM exit, so I think that the VM exit happens
> only under these conditions:
>
> — The EPT memory type (bits 2:0) must be a value supported by the
> processor as indicated in the IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP MSR (see
> Appendix A.10).
> — Bits 5:3 (1 less than the EPT page-walk length) must be 3, indicating
> an EPT page-walk length of 4; see Section 28.2.2.
> — Bit 6 (enable bit for accessed and dirty flags for EPT) must be 0 if
> bit 21 of the IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP MSR (see Appendix A.10) is read
> as 0, indicating that the processor does not support accessed and
> dirty flags for EPT.
> — Reserved bits 11:7 and 63:N (where N is the processor’s
> physical-address width) must all be 0.
>
> And it looks like we need parts of nested_ept_init_mmu_context() to
> properly handle VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT.
I completely ignored AD and the #VE sections. I will add a TODO item
in the comment section.
> The KVM_REQ_TRIPLE_FAULT can be handled by kvm_mmu_reload in vcpu_run if
> we just invalidate the MMU.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 20:49 [PATCH v4 0/3] Expose VMFUNC to the nested hypervisor Bandan Das
2017-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: vmx: Enable VMFUNCs Bandan Das
2017-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: nVMX: Enable VMFUNC for the L1 hypervisor Bandan Das
2017-07-10 20:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: nVMX: Emulate EPTP switching " Bandan Das
2017-07-11 7:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-07-11 8:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-11 13:52 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 18:05 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 19:12 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 19:34 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 17:58 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 18:22 ` Jim Mattson
2017-07-11 18:35 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 19:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 19:38 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 20:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 20:45 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-12 13:41 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-12 18:04 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 18:24 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 19:32 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 19:50 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2017-07-11 20:21 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 20:34 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-11 20:45 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-11 21:08 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-12 13:24 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-12 18:11 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-12 19:18 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-17 17:58 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-19 9:30 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-07-19 17:54 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-13 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-07-13 17:08 ` Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgd1964usz.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).