public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
@ 2013-07-11  9:49 Dâniel Fraga
  2013-07-12  6:52 ` Heinz Diehl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dâniel Fraga @ 2013-07-11  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

	I upgraded to kernel 3.10.0 and decided to try the new "Full
dynticks system (tickless)" option, but now the system load is always
at 1 or above.

	Using the previous "Idle dynticks system (tickless idle)" solves
the problem, so it seems the new Full dynticks code is causing this.

	Maybe Ingo Molnar can help to debug this (I put this in Power
Management, but if it should be in other area, please change).

My desktop is:
Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3
Core i7 2700k
8GB RAM

	Feel free to suggest how can I debug this to help you. I can try
patches if you want.

	Thank you.

-- 
Linux 3.10.0: Unicycling Gorilla
http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR
http://www.libertarios.org.br



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-11  9:49 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load Dâniel Fraga
@ 2013-07-12  6:52 ` Heinz Diehl
  2013-07-15 13:05   ` Dâniel Fraga
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Heinz Diehl @ 2013-07-12  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

On 11.07.2013, Dâniel Fraga wrote: 

> 	I upgraded to kernel 3.10.0 and decided to try the new "Full
> dynticks system (tickless)" option, but now the system load is always
> at 1 or above.
> 
> 	Using the previous "Idle dynticks system (tickless idle)" solves
> the problem, so it seems the new Full dynticks code is causing this.
> 

This describes exactly what I have encountered, and "tickless idle"
fixed it for me, too. So I'll second that.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-12  6:52 ` Heinz Diehl
@ 2013-07-15 13:05   ` Dâniel Fraga
  2013-07-15 13:36     ` Mike Galbraith
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dâniel Fraga @ 2013-07-15 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:52:27 +0200
Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> wrote:

> This describes exactly what I have encountered, and "tickless idle"
> fixed it for me, too. So I'll second that.

	Thanks for the confirmation. I hope Ingo Molnar fixes it.

-- 
Linux 3.10.0: Unicycling Gorilla
http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR
http://www.libertarios.org.br



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-15 13:05   ` Dâniel Fraga
@ 2013-07-15 13:36     ` Mike Galbraith
  2013-07-15 14:25       ` Frederic Weisbecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2013-07-15 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dâniel Fraga; +Cc: linux-kernel, Frederic Weisbecker

(add cc)

On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:05 -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote: 
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:52:27 +0200
> Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> wrote:
> 
> > This describes exactly what I have encountered, and "tickless idle"
> > fixed it for me, too. So I'll second that.
> 
> 	Thanks for the confirmation. I hope Ingo Molnar fixes it.
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-15 13:36     ` Mike Galbraith
@ 2013-07-15 14:25       ` Frederic Weisbecker
  2013-07-15 14:51         ` Dâniel Fraga
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2013-07-15 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Galbraith; +Cc: Dâniel Fraga, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 03:36:46PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> (add cc)
> 
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:05 -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote: 
> > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:52:27 +0200
> > Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > This describes exactly what I have encountered, and "tickless idle"
> > > fixed it for me, too. So I'll second that.
> > 
> > 	Thanks for the confirmation. I hope Ingo Molnar fixes it.
> > 
> 
> 

Hi,

Sorry I'm missing the description of the issue. Could you please
repaste it?

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-15 14:25       ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2013-07-15 14:51         ` Dâniel Fraga
  2013-07-15 15:01           ` Frederic Weisbecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dâniel Fraga @ 2013-07-15 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: Mike Galbraith, linux-kernel

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:25:59 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Sorry I'm missing the description of the issue. Could you please
> repaste it?
> 
> Thanks!

	The problem is that when we use the new Full dynticks option
form kernel 3.10.0, the load will go high, always above 1. Bug?

-- 
Linux 3.10.0: Unicycling Gorilla
http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR
http://www.libertarios.org.br

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-15 14:51         ` Dâniel Fraga
@ 2013-07-15 15:01           ` Frederic Weisbecker
  2013-07-15 18:50             ` Dâniel Fraga
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2013-07-15 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dâniel Fraga; +Cc: Mike Galbraith, linux-kernel

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:51:18AM -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:25:59 +0200
> Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Sorry I'm missing the description of the issue. Could you please
> > repaste it?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> 	The problem is that when we use the new Full dynticks option
> form kernel 3.10.0, the load will go high, always above 1. Bug?

You mean this is the result that the "uptime" command gives you? And
your system is doing something? Or is it mostly idle?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load
  2013-07-15 15:01           ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2013-07-15 18:50             ` Dâniel Fraga
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dâniel Fraga @ 2013-07-15 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frederic Weisbecker; +Cc: Mike Galbraith, linux-kernel

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:01:35 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:51:18AM -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> > 	The problem is that when we use the new Full dynticks option
> > form kernel 3.10.0, the load will go high, always above 1. Bug?
> 
> You mean this is the result that the "uptime" command gives you? And
> your system is doing something? Or is it mostly idle?

	It is idle, but the load remains high all the time. Going back
to the "Idle dynticks system (tickless idle)" solves the problem.

	So the issue is with the new Full dynticks.

-- 
Linux 3.10.0: Unicycling Gorilla
http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR
http://www.libertarios.org.br

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-15 18:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-11  9:49 3.10.0: Full dynticks = high load Dâniel Fraga
2013-07-12  6:52 ` Heinz Diehl
2013-07-15 13:05   ` Dâniel Fraga
2013-07-15 13:36     ` Mike Galbraith
2013-07-15 14:25       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-15 14:51         ` Dâniel Fraga
2013-07-15 15:01           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-07-15 18:50             ` Dâniel Fraga

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox