From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756232AbZCUTV1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:21:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755221AbZCUTSy (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:18:54 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:51882 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755242AbZCUTSx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:18:53 -0400 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Matthew A. Bockol" References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #12763] Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:39:02 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12763 Subject : Different cpu MHz values for processor0 and processor1 Submitter : Matthew A. Bockol Date : 2009-02-21 5:42 (29 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123519687807246&w=4