From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753398Ab2ABRuO (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:50:14 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48096 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753371Ab2ABRuM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:50:12 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Vlado Plaga Subject: Re: where to report bugs while bugzilla.kernel.org is down? Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4EB0205E.4050602@gmail.com> <20111101181920.2c6655dd@stein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 82.174.127.6 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0 Iceweasel/8.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stefan Richter s5r6.in-berlin.de> writes: > Even when bugzilla.kernel.org comes back, report bugs preferably to > mailinglists. I don't see why that should be better: bugzilla forwards reports to mailing lists anyway, doesn't it? And certainly it is a big advantage to have bugs tracked in bugzilla, which to me seems more accessible for occasional participation than a mainling list. I hope the Kernel bugzilla is back soon!