[PATCH 3.16 146/306] target: Don't override EXTENDED_COPY xcopy_pt_cmd SCSI status code

Ben Hutchings
2017-02-15T23:24:59Z

From: Dinesh Israni <ddi@datera.io>

commit 926317de33998c112c5510301868ea9aa34097e2 upstream.

This patch addresses a bug where a local EXTENDED_COPY WRITE or READ
backend I/O request would always return SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION,
even if underlying xcopy_pt_cmd->se_cmd generated a different
SCSI status code.

ESX host environments expect to hit SAM_STAT_RESERVATION_CONFLICT
for certain scenarios, and SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION results in
non-retriable status for these cases.

Tested on v4.1.y with ESX v5.5u2+ with local IBLOCK backend copy.

Reported-by: Nixon Vincent <nixon.vincent@calsoftinc.com>
Tested-by: Nixon Vincent <nixon.vincent@calsoftinc.com>
Cc: Nixon Vincent <nixon.vincent@calsoftinc.com>
Tested-by: Dinesh Israni <ddi@datera.io>
Signed-off-by: Dinesh Israni <ddi@datera.io>
Cc: Dinesh Israni <ddi@datera.io>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c
@@ -707,6 +707,7 @@ static int target_xcopy_read_source(
rc = target_xcopy_setup_pt_cmd(xpt_cmd, xop, src_dev, &cdb[0],
remote_port, true);
if (rc < 0) {
+ ec_cmd->scsi_status = xpt_cmd->se_cmd.scsi_status;
transport_generic_free_cmd(se_cmd, 0);
return rc;
}
@@ -718,6 +719,7 @@ static int target_xcopy_read_source(

rc = target_xcopy_issue_pt_cmd(xpt_cmd);
if (rc < 0) {
+ ec_cmd->scsi_status = xpt_cmd->se_cmd.scsi_status;
transport_generic_free_cmd(se_cmd, 0);
return rc;
}
@@ -768,6 +770,7 @@ static int target_xcopy_write_destinatio
remote_port, false);
if (rc < 0) {
struct se_cmd *src_cmd = &xop->src_pt_cmd->se_cmd;
+ ec_cmd->scsi_status = xpt_cmd->se_cmd.scsi_status;
/*
* If the failure happened before the t_mem_list hand-off in
* target_xcopy_setup_pt_cmd(), Reset memory + clear flag so that
@@ -783,6 +786,7 @@ static int target_xcopy_write_destinatio

rc = target_xcopy_issue_pt_cmd(xpt_cmd);
if (rc < 0) {
+ ec_cmd->scsi_status = xpt_cmd->se_cmd.scsi_status;
se_cmd->se_cmd_flags &= ~SCF_PASSTHROUGH_SG_TO_MEM_NOALLOC;
transport_generic_free_cmd(se_cmd, 0);
return rc;
@@ -869,10 +873,14 @@ static void target_xcopy_do_work(struct
out:
xcopy_pt_undepend_remotedev(xop);
kfree(xop);
-
- pr_warn_ratelimited("target_xcopy_do_work: rc: %d, Setting X-COPY CHECK_CONDITION"
- " -> sending response\n", rc);
- ec_cmd->scsi_status = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
+ /*
+ * Don't override an error scsi status if it has already been set
+ */
+ if (ec_cmd->scsi_status == SAM_STAT_GOOD) {
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("target_xcopy_do_work: rc: %d, Setting X-COPY"
+ " CHECK_CONDITION -> sending response\n", rc);
+ ec_cmd->scsi_status = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
+ }
target_complete_cmd(ec_cmd, SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION);
}