From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization.
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:56:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m11vu183ti.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ab8p89is.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Sat\, 14 Feb 2009 04\:53\:31 -0800")
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> And on the big gotcha's I have found one more I am tracking.
>
> I am seeing pci bridges with a NULL pointer for the subordinate bus.
> Earlier I had thought that this was a symptom of the double remove
> but I have been able to reproduce it without that.
>
> On just a little bit deeper investigation it looks like the cases
> are dying are all coming when the nested bridge reappears.
>
> Which is wrong on so many levels as I am toggle power to the outer
> slot, so the nested bridge should not even exist at that time. Ugh.
> More tracing to for me on that one.
Ok. Got it. I was processing the interrupt for a device after it had
been hot removed but before the device state had disappeared.
pcie_isr looks like it would be even worse in that situation. Looping forever
if pciehp_readw(ctrl, PCIE_EXPSLTA) always succeed sand returns 0xffff.
That loop in there appears impossibly misguided. If the pending interrupt
values change after you have received the interrupt another instance
of the same interrupt should be pending so the loop should be completely
unnecessary.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-14 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 3:31 [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-29 7:34 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-13 19:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-14 4:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-14 12:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-14 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-02-16 8:02 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-17 23:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-18 5:48 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-23 11:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 17:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-24 17:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-16 8:00 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-18 0:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-18 7:12 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-18 8:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 6:18 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-23 11:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 17:38 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m11vu183ti.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox