From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used.
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:02:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m13bbpu7i5.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060821095328.3132.40575.sendpatchset@cherry.local> (Magnus Damm's message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:54:16 +0900 (JST)")
Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp> writes:
> x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used.
>
> The current x86_64 startup code never reloads CS during the early boot process
> if the 64-bit function startup_64 is used as entry point. The 32-bit entry
> point startup_32 does the right thing and reloads CS, and this is what most
> people are using if they use bzImage.
>
> This patch fixes the case when the Linux kernel is booted into using kexec
> under Xen. The Xen hypervisor is using large CS values which makes the x86_64
> kernel fail - but only if vmlinux is booted, bzImage works well because it
> is using the 32-bit entry point.
>
> The main question is if we require that the boot loader should setup CS
> to some certain offset to be able to boot the kernel. The sane solution IMO
> should be that the kernel requires that the loaded descriptors are correct,
> but that the exact offset within the GDT the boot loader is using should not
> matter. This is the way the i386 boot works if I understand things correctly.
What extra reload of cs does Xen introduce?
I'm not really comfortable with a half virtualized case.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-21 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-21 9:54 [PATCH][RFC] x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used Magnus Damm
2006-08-21 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 13:29 ` [Fastboot] " Magnus Damm
2006-08-21 14:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 0:47 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-21 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-08-21 14:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 14:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-08-21 15:04 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 20:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-21 20:10 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 21:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-21 21:02 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-08-22 0:58 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-22 3:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-22 4:10 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-22 8:03 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 8:37 ` [PATCH] " Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-22 8:53 ` [Fastboot] " Magnus Damm
2006-08-22 9:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-23 3:10 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-22 9:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-22 9:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m13bbpu7i5.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox