From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262132AbVCIXy6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:54:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262496AbVCIXOb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:14:31 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:41383 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262431AbVCIW4Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:56:16 -0500 To: Christoph Lameter Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Page Fault Scalability patch V19 [4/4]: Drop use of page_table_lock in do_anonymous_page References: <20050309201324.29721.28956.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20050309201344.29721.26698.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 23:56:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050309201344.29721.26698.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (Christoph Lameter's message of "Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:13:44 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter writes: > Do not use the page_table_lock in do_anonymous_page. This will significantly > increase the parallelism in the page fault handler in SMP systems. The patch > also modifies the definitions of _mm_counter functions so that rss and anon_rss > become atomic. I still think it's a bad idea to add arbitary process size limits like this: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATOMIC_TABLE_OPS > +/* > + * Atomic page table operations require that the counters are also > + * incremented atomically > +*/ > +#define set_mm_counter(mm, member, value) atomic_set(&(mm)->member, value) > +#define get_mm_counter(mm, member) ((unsigned long)atomic_read(&(mm)->member)) > +#define update_mm_counter(mm, member, value) atomic_add(value, &(mm)->member) > +#define MM_COUNTER_T atomic_t Can you use atomic64_t on 64bit systems at least? -Andi