From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl (Arjan van de Ven)
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:15:45 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m145ZMP-000OWyC@amadeus.home.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012111636040.4808-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <E145Xy6-0008HA-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In article <E145Xy6-0008HA-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
>> Doing a 'make bzImage' is NOT VM-intensive. Using this as a test
>> for the VM doesn't make any sense since it doesn't really excercise
>> the VM in any way...
> Its an interesting demo that 2.4 has some performance problems since 2.2
> is slower than 2.0 although nowdays not much.
Seems to depend on the hardware used. On my test box, 2.4 is faster by
0.3s....
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
Machine:
AMD Duron 700Mhz with 128Mb of 133Mhz Ram
2 IBM 15Gb ATA100 disks in RAID0 raid
tested kernels:
2.2.18 + raid patch + latest IDE patch
2.4.0-test12pre7
compiling 2.2.18 with gcc 2.95.2
1st run 2nd 3rd
kernel 2.2.18/raid/ide 3:28.909 3:28.819 3:28.840
kernel 2.4.0test12pre7 3:28:520 3:28.534 3:28.546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-11 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-10 20:36 UP 2.2.18 makes kernels 3% faster than UP 2.4.0-test12 Steven Cole
2000-12-11 18:16 ` John Fremlin
2000-12-11 18:38 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-11 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-11 19:50 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2000-12-11 20:15 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2000-12-11 20:23 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-11 22:03 ` Gerhard Mack
2000-12-11 22:06 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-13 9:44 ` Rogier Wolff
2000-12-14 13:08 ` Russell King
2000-12-16 0:40 ` george anzinger
2000-12-12 14:49 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 18:18 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-12 20:19 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-12 22:09 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-11 22:12 ` Gabor Lenart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-10 15:31 Steven Cole
2000-12-10 19:52 ` Aaron Tiensivu
2000-12-11 23:02 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-12 5:17 ` Steven Cole
2000-12-12 5:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2000-12-12 11:01 ` Helge Hafting
2000-12-12 10:27 ` Rik van Riel
2000-12-12 14:15 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m145ZMP-000OWyC@amadeus.home.nl \
--to=arjan@fenrus.demon.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox