From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:58:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14p64i0lr.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440808011916q1a279ael995eaeaa655c239@mail.gmail.com> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:16:28 -0700")
"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dhaval Giani got:
>> kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
>> CPU 24
>> ...
>>
>> his system (x3950) has 8 ioapic, irq > 256
>>
>> caused by
>> commit 9b7dc567d03d74a1fbae84e88949b6a60d922d82
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Date: Fri May 2 20:10:09 2008 +0200
>>
>> x86: unify interrupt vector defines
>>
>> The interrupt vector defines are copied 4 times around with minimal
>> differences. Move them all into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h
>>
>> because 64bit allow same vector for different cpu to serve different irq
>>
>> need to create that array dynamically later
>>
>> v2: change NR_IRQS to 1024
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> this is for
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11201
>
> but need SGI guys to verify in their system. they like to have NR_IRQS to be 224
There was a patch that came out a while ago that set NR_IRQS as NR_IOAPICS*32 from
SGI. Where that got to I don't recall.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-02 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 2:02 [PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-08-02 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-02 2:58 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-08-02 3:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-02 3:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-04 13:20 ` Mike Travis
2008-08-04 18:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-03 5:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-03 5:26 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Restore the proper NR_IRQS define so larger systems work Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-03 5:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-03 6:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-03 6:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-03 6:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-29 21:14 [PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-07-29 22:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-07-29 23:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m14p64i0lr.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox