public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: "Martin MOKREJ©" <mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory management weirdness
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:47:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14qg5mq5v.fsf@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4219E62D.7000009@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> (Martin MOKREJ©'s message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:46:21 +0100")

Martin MOKREJ© <mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz> writes:

> Hi,
>   I have received no answer to my former question
> (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110827143716215&w=2).

That's because it's a BIOS problem.

There are limits on how much Linux can work around BIOS breakage.


>   Although I've not re-tested this today again, it used to help a bit to specify
> mem=3548M to decrease memory used by linux (tested with AGP card plugged in, when
> bios reported 3556MB RAM only).
>
>   I found that removing the AGP based videoc card and using an old PCI based
> video card results in bios detecting 4072MB of RAM. But still, the machine was
> slow. I've tried to "cat >| /proc/mtrr" to alter the memory settings, but the
> result was only a partial speedup.
>
>   I'm not sure how to convince linux kernel to run fast again.

It's most likely a MTRR problem. Play more with them.


>   Finally, I put back two 512MB memory modules to have only 3GB RAM physically,
> and the result is at http://www.natur.cuni.cz/~mmokrejs/tmp/128MB/only_phys_3GB/.


The cheaper Intel chipsets don't support >4GB at all, and you always
need some space below 4GB for PCI memory mappings/AGP aperture etc.


>   About a week ago I tried to contact ASUS, but no answer so far from their
> techinical support through some web robot.
> http://vip.asus.com/eservice/techmailstatus.aspx?ID=WTM200502111723398547
> I do not recommend their "greatest" and real "flag-ship" P4C800-E-Deluxe
> motherboard for use with memory sizes above 3GB (although they claim 4GB
> is possible). BIOS is the latest release 1.19, although 1.20.001 was tested
> as well.

In general non server boards tend to be not very well or not at all
tested with a lot of memory ("a lot" is defined as >2GB for higher end
desktop boards, or >1GB on very cheap desktop boards). That is a
common problem on other motherboards too; Asus is not alone with this.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-21 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-21 13:46 memory management weirdness Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-02-21 23:47 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-02-22  8:04   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-22 10:14     ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-06-02 11:31   ` Martin MOKREJS(
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-21 14:20 Parag Warudkar
2005-02-22  9:57 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-02-24  2:24   ` Parag Warudkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m14qg5mq5v.fsf@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox