From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: tyson@rwii.com (Tyson D Sawyer), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Missed jiffies
Date: 16 Feb 2002 11:44:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14rkh5ks1.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16c7yN-0006a2-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16c7yN-0006a2-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> > My system looses about 8 seconds every 20 minutes. This is reported
> > by ntp and verified by comparing 'date' to 'hwclock --show' and a wall
> > clock.
> >
> > My system is a x86 Dell laptop with HZ=1024.
> >
> > I am quite certain that the issue is the System Management Interrupt
> > (SMI).
>
> Possibly and if it is you can't really do much about it.
Except usually the truly annoyed can reprogram the chipset so an SMI
interrupt is not generated. But I doubt that is practical on a
laptop.
> ACPI may help here but lots of vendors implement their ACPI subsystem using
> I/O cycles to jump into SMM mode so its game over again.
Hmm. I wonder if this is a simple transition technique or if it is
their long term strategy.
Now I'm going to research and see if SMM mode is supported on with
x86-64 and ia64. With ACPI the case can at least be made that SMM
mode is not strictly necessary and should be dropped. I'm dreaming
but if the processors didn't have this super protected mode, BIOS
vendors and operating system vendors would be force to cooperate on
these issues.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-16 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-16 15:16 Missed jiffies Tyson D Sawyer
2002-02-16 16:05 ` george anzinger
2002-02-16 16:14 ` yodaiken
2002-02-16 17:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-17 2:18 ` disregard lee johnson
2002-02-17 22:48 ` Missed jiffies H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-18 19:04 ` george anzinger
2002-02-18 19:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-18 19:33 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <a4pbvi@cesium.transmeta.com>
2002-02-19 9:30 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-19 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-16 16:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-16 18:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2002-02-16 19:02 ` george anzinger
2002-02-19 9:25 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m14rkh5ks1.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tyson@rwii.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox