From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 01:27:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 01:26:51 -0400 Received: from juicer38.bigpond.com ([139.134.6.95]:1522 "EHLO mailin7.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 01:26:40 -0400 Message-Id: From: Rusty Russell To: hch@caldera.de (Christoph Hellwig) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] HotPlug CPU patch against 2.4.5 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:59:26 +0200." <200106161359.f5GDxQ214335@ns.caldera.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:32:06 +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <200106161359.f5GDxQ214335@ns.caldera.de> you write: > In article you wrote: > > # Up... > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/cpu/1 > > Wouldn't /proc/sys/cpu//enable be better? This way other per-cpu > sysctls could be added more easily... Yep. But rewrite the sysctl crap first to make dynamically adding and deleting entries sane. Cheers, Rusty. -- Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK