From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757407AbZBSUzc (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:55:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754099AbZBSUzV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:55:21 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:44430 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753762AbZBSUzT (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:55:19 -0500 To: Andrew Morton Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090219120333.af992d9e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:55:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20090219120333.af992d9e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Thu\, 19 Feb 2009 12\:03\:33 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.169.126.145;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.169.126.145 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Andrew Morton X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0002] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcie_portdriver: FIX: pcie_port_device_remove X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > > There are large-scale and conflicting changes to this file in linux-next. > > If we want to jam this fix into 2.6.29 (and it looks like something we > want) then this will trash the linux-next changes. It will cause me > grief, and will cause Stephen grief unless the pci tree is suitably > changed, which will cause Jesse grief. Either way: grief. Ugh. I had better have a good hard look at linux-next. I tried to ask earlier about ongoing working but I didn't hear anything. Eric