From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: ncunningham@cyclades.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: reboot vs poweroff
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 12:23:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m164tkpryx.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43174643.7040007@drzeus.cx> (Pierre Ossman's message of "Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:19:47 +0200")
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> writes:
>
> Patch tested and works fine here. You should probably make a note in the
> bugzilla so we don't get a conflicting merge from the ACPI folks.
Thanks.
If I can figure out bugzilla...
> I suppose Nigel should use this function in swsusp2 aswell?
If he is doing the same thing yes.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-29 0:17 Linux 2.6.13 Linus Torvalds
2005-08-29 0:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-29 3:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-29 10:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-29 12:17 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-08-29 12:25 ` Jörn Engel
2005-08-29 12:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-08-29 14:25 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2005-08-29 14:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-29 14:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-29 15:44 ` [PATCH] convert signal handling of NODEFER to act like other Unix boxes Steven Rostedt
2005-08-29 18:04 ` [PATCH] convert signal handling of NODEFER to act like other Unix boxes. [take2] Steven Rostedt
2005-08-29 12:19 ` Linux 2.6.13 Nigel Cunningham
2005-08-29 14:22 ` Roland Dreier
2005-09-01 6:24 ` reboot vs poweroff (was: Linux 2.6.13) Meelis Roos
2005-09-01 6:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-01 7:33 ` Meelis Roos
2005-09-01 12:32 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-09-01 12:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-01 15:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-01 15:19 ` reboot vs poweroff Pierre Ossman
2005-09-01 17:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-01 18:19 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-09-01 18:23 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2005-09-01 21:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-02 4:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-01 20:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-02 4:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-01 21:09 ` reboot vs poweroff (was: Linux 2.6.13) Nigel Cunningham
2005-08-29 18:23 ` Oops in 2.6.13 (was Linux 2.6.13 ) Masoud Sharbiani
2005-08-29 20:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-30 3:47 ` Masoud Sharbiani
2005-08-30 22:41 ` Linux 2.6.13 Henrik Persson
2005-09-01 2:29 ` Greg KH
2005-09-03 9:22 ` Henrik Persson
2005-08-31 12:42 ` Alexandre Buisse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-01 18:23 reboot vs poweroff Brown, Len
2005-09-02 4:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-10 21:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-11 8:43 ` Meelis Roos
2005-09-11 8:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m164tkpryx.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox