From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow execve'ing "/proc/self/exe" even if /proc is not mounted
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17hz0i449.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1158166a0906241600w5f7f4ffcm49d9c849f0c27f72@mail.gmail.com> (Denys Vlasenko's message of "Thu\, 25 Jun 2009 01\:00\:56 +0200")
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> writes:
> In some circumstances running process needs to re-execute
> its image.
>
> Among other useful cases, it is _crucial_ for NOMMU arches.
>
> They need it to perform daemonization. Classic sequence
> of "fork, parent dies, child continues" can't be used
> due to lack of fork on NOMMU, and instead we have to do
> "vfork, child re-exec itself (with a flag to not daemonize)
> and therefore unblocks parent, parent dies".
Why?
I would expect a simple assembly wrapper around clone would work.
I.e. Create a new process but share the MM and reuse the same
stack. When clone returns if we are the parent exit, otherwise
continue on with life.
> Another crucial use case on NOMMU is POSIX shell support.
> Imagine a shell command of the form "func1 | func2 | func3".
> This can be implemented on NOMMU by vforking thrice,
> re-executing the shell in every child in the form
> "<shell> -c 'body of funcN'", and letting parent wait and collect
> exitcodes and such. As far as I can see, it's the only way
> to implement it correctly on NOMMU.
>
> The program may re-execute itself by name if it knows the name,
> but we generally may be unsure about it. Binary may be renamed,
> or even deleted while it is being run.
It really sounds like you want to implement fork for NOMMU.
If you have a base address register which everything is relative
to I can't imagine it would be too hard. Heck you might even be
able to do it in user space.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 23:00 [PATCH] allow execve'ing "/proc/self/exe" even if /proc is not mounted Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-24 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 23:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-24 14:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-25 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-26 8:06 ` Florian Weimer
2009-06-24 23:58 ` Al Viro
2009-06-25 0:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-26 23:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-25 8:10 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-26 8:00 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-26 13:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-26 22:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-06-28 19:31 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-06-25 18:02 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-06-25 18:16 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17hz0i449.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox