From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v2] x86 boot : export boot_params via sysfs
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:08:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17ijjtssk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071212144351.3fd0c6ec.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (Randy Dunlap's message of "Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:43:51 -0800")
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> writes:
> I don't know if this patch is trying to solve this (->) problem, but there
> is a desire for drivers to have a decent way to tell if the kernel that
> is executing is a kexec/crash kernel or not. If it is a kexec/crash
> kernel, then (some) drivers may not allocate as many buffers as they
> normally do, since the kernel would likely be configured to use
> less memory. The solution doesn't have to involve sysfs .. or it could.
The patch is trying to make it easier to observe new fields passed to
the kernel by the bootloader in user space.
The drivers should have a way to look at the amount of memory the
kernel is configured to use and operate on that. I expect this is a
general embedded scenario.
I don't think I have seen a driver concern in the kdump environment
that is unique to that environment. So in general I figure we should
use whatever it is that is different about the kdump environment that
the causes the drivers to want to do something differently, so the
changes can ideally support more people.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-12 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-12 8:59 [PATCH -mm -v2] x86 boot : export boot_params via sysfs Huang, Ying
2007-12-12 17:46 ` Greg KH
2007-12-12 17:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-12 18:59 ` Greg KH
2007-12-12 19:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-12 22:21 ` Greg KH
2007-12-12 22:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-12-12 22:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-12-12 23:08 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-12-12 22:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17ijjtssk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox