public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Sid Boyce <g3vbv@blueyonder.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, auxsvr@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1 and 2.6.21-rc2 kwin dies silently
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:17:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17itabbbv.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070321193420.GP752@stusta.de> (Adrian Bunk's message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:34:20 +0100")

Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:43:11PM +0000, Sid Boyce wrote:
>> Sid Boyce wrote:
>> >Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >>(cc restored.  Please always do reply-to-all)
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >>>On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:05:13 +0200 auxsvr@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>On Wednesday 28 February 2007 17:19, Sid Boyce wrote:
>> >>>   
>> >>>>openSUSE 10.3 Alpha and KDE-3.5.6, xorg-x11-7.2. KDE is setup not to
>> >>>>require a password to unlock, but it asks for password. When the screen
>> >>>>unlocks, kwin is gone with no errors logged in /var/log/kdm or
>> >>>>/var/log/messages. No problems with 2.6.20.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Same problem on openSUSE 10.2 x86_64, KDE-3.5.5 and 2.6.21-rc2.
>> >>>>Regards
>> >>>>Sid.
>> >>>>      
>> >>>This is the linux kernel mailing list. Perhaps you should post your 
>> >>>problem to the opensuse mailing list.
>> >>>    
>> >>
>> >>2.6.20 worked.
>> >>
>> >>2.6.20-rc2 did not.
>> >>
>> >>Working theory: the kernel broke.
>> >>
>> >>Sid, the chances that anyone can work out what caused this are pretty 
>> >>low. It would be great if you could perform a git bisection search 
>> >>sometime in
>> >>the next few weeks, work out which commit caused this.
>> >>
>> >>Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  
>> >I shall go back to 2.6.20-git3 and work forward. Up to 2.6.20-git2 was OK.
>> >Regards
>> >Sid.
>> >
>> 
>> I tracked the problem down to 2.6.20-git11. Up to 2.6.20-git10 is OK, 
>> but from 2.6.20-git11 up to current 2.6.21-rc4-git2 all exhibit the problem.
>
> Thanks for this search.
>
> Looking at the changes between 2.6.20-git10 and 2.6.20-git11, the only 
> suspicious changes are the 60 sysctl patches by Eric.
>
> Eric, can you look at this issue?

git bisect between git10 (ac98695d6c1508b724f246f38ce57fb4e3cec356)
and git11 (86a71dbd3e81e8870d0f0e56b87875f57e58222b) is likely the most
productive thing that can be done right now.  

I can't think of anything in my sysctl patches that would kill an
application.  My sysctl work is right on the border with user space
so it is a good candidate but at the same time there should have
been no user visible changes.  There were a few places where
I removed sys_sysctl support (but not /proc/sys support) but I don't
think any of those were on x86, and they were is such a messed up
state I don't think anyone could have reasonably used them anyway.

So I think either we poke blindly making random guess by hand or
we let git-bisect do it.

Sid do you think you can figure out git-bisect?
git-bisect start
git-bisect bad 86a71dbd3e81e8870d0f0e56b87875f57e58222b
git-bisect good ac98695d6c1508b724f246f38ce57fb4e3cec356

It should narrow the problem down to a single commit in 6-8 tries
after which point we should have enough information to start
making intelligent guesses. 

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-21 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-28 15:19 2.6.21-rc1 and 2.6.21-rc2 kwin dies silently Sid Boyce
2007-02-28 16:05 ` auxsvr
2007-03-08  5:47   ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-08  7:34     ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-21 17:43       ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-21 19:34         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-21 20:17           ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-03-22  1:32             ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-22  1:42               ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-22 10:59                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-22 19:49                   ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-26 12:02                     ` boris
2007-03-27  3:38                   ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-27 13:48                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-28  3:26                       ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-28  4:14                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-28 13:17                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-29 11:35                           ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-30 18:00                             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-29  4:04                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-29 11:37                           ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-29 16:16                             ` Sid Boyce
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-28 16:24 Sid Boyce
     [not found] <45E5DE32.2070902@argo.co.il>
2007-03-01 13:52 ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-01 15:11   ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-02  4:22     ` Sid Boyce
     [not found] <45E939E1.8050501@argo.co.il>
2007-03-03 20:30 ` Sid Boyce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m17itabbbv.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=auxsvr@gmail.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=g3vbv@blueyonder.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox