From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754607Ab1JSVgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:36:12 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:41321 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754447Ab1JSVgH (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:36:07 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: David Miller Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com, fubar@us.ibm.com, andy@greyhouse.net References: <20111019.000932.523712028439316177.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:27:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20111019.000932.523712028439316177.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:09:32 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=98.207.153.68;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18QAVpp4tnYUtX4w5LdLJmzuzIsmYYLr4w= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 98.207.153.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 1.5 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;David Miller X-Spam-Relay-Country: ** Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Better namespace handling for /sys/class/net/bonding_masters X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:31:04 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:47:46 -0700 > >> Greg, Dave I'm don't know whose tree to merge this through as this code >> is equally device-core and networking. I am hoping that we can get this >> improvement merged for 3.2. > > I'm happy to take this series into my net-next tree. > > Greg? Any objections? on the 13th Greg said: > These all look fine to me, and I have no problem with them going through > the network tree as that will most likely be the easiest way due to any > potential merge issues. > > David, feel free to add an: > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > to these patches and take them through your tree if that is ok with you. > If not, I can also always take them through mine, it's your choice. Eric