From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, garyhade@us.ibm.com,
iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, trenn@suse.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq()
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:37:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18wabzvd5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8995FB.9000908@kernel.org> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Sat\, 27 Feb 2010 14\:00\:27 -0800")
>> /* By default isa irqs are identity mapped to gsis */
>> unsigned int isa_irq_to_gsi[16] = {
>> 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
>> };
>>
>> unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
>> {
>> unsigned int irq = gsi + 16;
>> unsigned int i;
>> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>> if (isa_irq_to_gsi[i] == gsi)
>> irq = i;
>> }
>> return irq;
>> }
I just realized that we already have this function in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c and arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c it is called:
acpi_gsi_to_irq()
We still need this implementation but it will get really confusing if
we have two functions with the same name trying to do the same job.
I am relieved to see this because this should mean we shouldn't have
many hard fixed assumptions that irq == gsi.
This does mean though that your patch has a real bug in it because
you have not updated acpi_gsi_to_irq.
Eric
>> unsigned int irq_to_gsi(unsigned int irq)
>> {
>> unsigned int gsi;
>> if (irq < 16) {
>> gsi = isa_irq_to_gsi[irq];
>> } else {
>> gsi = irq - 16;
>> }
>> return gsi;
>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201002221108.42847.trenn@suse.de>
[not found] ` <4B826CA6.7060007@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <201002221258.38506.trenn@suse.de>
2010-02-23 9:07 ` Other problem/regression with b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30 Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23 18:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23 20:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-26 19:30 ` [PATCH -v8 1/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - have right boot_ioapic_idx Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 12:57 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi - have the " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-02-26 19:31 ` [PATCH -v8 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 12:57 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 13:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-27 18:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-27 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 19:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 21:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 22:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 22:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 22:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 1:12 ` [PATCH -v9] x86: fix out of order of gsi Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 3:26 ` [PATCH -v10] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 3:47 ` [PATCH -v11] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28 9:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 14:40 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-01 18:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 9:06 ` [PATCH -v12 1/2] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 19:51 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order of gsi tip-bot for Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-28 9:08 ` [PATCH -v12 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 18:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 19:37 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-03-01 20:26 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 16:46 ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-01 18:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 18:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 18:33 ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-23 19:02 ` Other problem/regression with b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30 Gary Hade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m18wabzvd5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox