public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, garyhade@us.ibm.com,
	iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, trenn@suse.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq()
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:37:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18wabzvd5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8995FB.9000908@kernel.org> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Sat\, 27 Feb 2010 14\:00\:27 -0800")


>> /* By default isa irqs are identity mapped to gsis */
>> unsigned int isa_irq_to_gsi[16] = {
>> 	0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
>> };
>> 
>> unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi)
>> {
>> 	unsigned int irq = gsi + 16;
>> 	unsigned int i;
>> 	for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>> 		if (isa_irq_to_gsi[i] == gsi)
>> 			irq = i;
>> 	}
>> 	return irq;
>> }

I just realized that we already have this function in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c and arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c it is called:
acpi_gsi_to_irq()

We still need this implementation but it will get really confusing if
we have two functions with the same name trying to do the same job.

I am relieved to see this because this should mean we shouldn't have
many hard fixed assumptions that irq == gsi.

This does mean though that your patch has a real bug in it because
you have not updated acpi_gsi_to_irq.

Eric

>> unsigned int irq_to_gsi(unsigned int irq)
>> {
>> 	unsigned int gsi;
>> 	if (irq < 16) {
>> 		gsi = isa_irq_to_gsi[irq];
>> 	} else {
>>         	gsi = irq - 16;
>>         }
>>         return gsi;
>> }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-01 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201002221108.42847.trenn@suse.de>
     [not found] ` <4B826CA6.7060007@kernel.org>
     [not found]   ` <201002221258.38506.trenn@suse.de>
2010-02-23  9:07     ` Other problem/regression with b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30 Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23 18:40       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23 20:17         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-26 19:30         ` [PATCH -v8 1/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - have right boot_ioapic_idx Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 12:57           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi - have the " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-02-26 19:31         ` [PATCH -v8 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 12:57           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 13:01             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-27 18:52               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 22:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-27 19:04               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 19:40                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 21:30                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 22:00                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-27 22:18                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-27 22:58                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  1:12                         ` [PATCH -v9] x86: fix out of order of gsi Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  3:26                           ` [PATCH -v10] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  3:47                         ` [PATCH -v11] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  8:09                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28  9:05                             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 14:40                               ` Thomas Renninger
2010-03-01 18:31                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28  9:06                             ` [PATCH -v12 1/2] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-28 19:51                               ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order of gsi tip-bot for Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-28  9:08                             ` [PATCH -v12 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 18:59                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 19:37                       ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-03-01 20:26                         ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Fix out of order gsi -- add remap_ioapic_gsi_to_irq() Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 16:46                     ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-03-01 18:37                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-01 18:44                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-01 18:33                         ` [LKML] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-02-23 19:02       ` Other problem/regression with b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30 Gary Hade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m18wabzvd5.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox