From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file.
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:33:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18wejanw4.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911061004.01007.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (Christian Borntraeger's message of "Fri\, 6 Nov 2009 10\:04\:00 +0100")
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
> Am Freitag 06 November 2009 01:41:44 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>>
>> In preparation for more invasive cleanups separate the core
>> binary sysctl logic into it's own file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Hmm, with your patches on Linus git I get the following on s390:
>
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c: In function 'SYSC_sysctl':
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c:126: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'lock_kernel'
> kernel/sysctl_binary.c:129: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'unlock_kernel'
Bah. A missing smp_lock.h.
Thanks.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-06 0:40 [PATCH 0/11] generic compat_sys_sysctl Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 9:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-06 11:33 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-11-06 12:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-06 12:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 13:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-06 13:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] sysctl: Refactor the binary sysctl handling to remove duplicate code Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] sysctl: Introduce a generic compat sysctl sysctl Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] sysctl: ia64 Use the compat_sys_sysctl Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] sysctl: mips " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] sysctl: parisc " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 6:01 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] sysctl: s390 " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 9:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-06 10:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 9:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] sysctl: sparc " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 1:42 ` David Miller
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] sysctl: x86 " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-06 1:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] sysctl: Remove the cond_syscall entry for sys32_sysctl Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] sysctl: Make do_sysctl static Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 0:48 ` [PATCH 0/11] generic compat_sys_sysctl Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-06 10:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m18wejanw4.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox