From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:51:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18wjtbwii.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A329CF8.4050502@goop.org> (Jeremy Fitzhardinge's message of "Fri\, 12 Jun 2009 11\:22\:48 -0700")
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes:
> Parse the ACPI MADT for I/O APIC information, even if the cpu has no
> (apparent) local APIC (ie, the CPU's APIC feature flag is clear).
>
> In principle, the local APIC and the I/O APIC are distinct (but related)
> components, which can be independently present.
>
> In practice this can happen in a Xen system, where the hypervisor has
> full control over the local APICs, and delivers interrupts initiated by
> the I/O APICs via Xen's event channel mechanism.
>
> (This eliminates the need for any explicit if (xen...) tests in
> acpi/boot.c)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge<jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
To be very clear. We have mechanism and policy mixed in the mptable
and related code today. While we continue to have that mixed I think
even attempting to reuse it for Xen dom0 is a horrifically bad move.
Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 2410469..19d13e5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -193,9 +193,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> {
> struct acpi_table_madt *madt = NULL;
>
> - if (!cpu_has_apic)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> madt = (struct acpi_table_madt *)table;
> if (!madt) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "Unable to map MADT\n");
> @@ -1252,9 +1249,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_ioapic_entries(void)
> if (acpi_disabled || acpi_noirq)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (!cpu_has_apic)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> /*
> * if "noapic" boot option, don't look for IO-APICs
> */
> @@ -1357,6 +1351,16 @@ static void __init acpi_process_madt(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP
> generic_bigsmp_probe();
> #endif
> + }
> + if (error == -EINVAL) {
> + /*
> + * The ACPI tables themselves were malformed.
> + * Dell Precision Workstation 410, 610 come here.
> + */
> + printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> + "Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI\n");
> + disable_acpi();
> + } else {
> /*
> * Parse MADT IO-APIC entries
> */
> @@ -1370,14 +1374,6 @@ static void __init acpi_process_madt(void)
> apic->setup_apic_routing();
> }
> }
> - if (error == -EINVAL) {
> - /*
> - * Dell Precision Workstation 410, 610 come here.
> - */
> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> - "Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI\n");
> - disable_acpi();
> - }
> } else {
> /*
> * ACPI found no MADT, and so ACPI wants UP PIC mode.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index c6acce2..d5e3f03 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -1807,6 +1807,10 @@ __apicdebuginit(void) print_all_local_APICs(void)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> + /* don't print out if apic is not there */
> + if (!cpu_has_apic)
> + return;
> +
> preempt_disable();
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> smp_call_function_single(cpu, print_local_APIC, NULL, 1);
> @@ -1849,8 +1853,7 @@ __apicdebuginit(int) print_all_ICs(void)
> {
> print_PIC();
>
> - /* don't print out if apic is not there */
> - if (!cpu_has_apic || disable_apic)
> + if (disable_apic)
> return 0;
>
> print_all_local_APICs();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 18:22 [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 18:28 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-12 18:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 20:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-06-15 2:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-12 20:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 2:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-15 10:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 20:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-15 21:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-16 19:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-17 5:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-17 12:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-17 17:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 2:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 19:34 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 20:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 21:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19 1:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 3:10 ` [Xen-devel] " Jiang, Yunhong
2009-06-18 12:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-15 10:51 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-06-18 16:08 ` Len Brown
2009-06-18 19:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 19:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 19:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-18 20:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-18 22:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19 2:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 19:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-06-19 23:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Nakajima, Jun
2009-06-20 7:39 ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-20 8:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20 8:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2009-06-20 10:22 ` Keir Fraser
2009-06-20 8:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 5:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-19 5:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-19 7:52 ` [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs justbecause " Jan Beulich
2009-06-19 8:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20 3:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-20 5:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-06-20 5:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-18 22:51 ` [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because " Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m18wjtbwii.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox