The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] teach set_special_pids() to use struct pid
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:51:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18x4kon6i.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071126142555.GA16528@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:25:55 +0300")

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:

> Change set_special_pids() to work with struct pid, not pid_t from global name
> space. This again speedups and imho cleanups the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

Overall I like it, and the version I keep meaning to send missed
the fact we only need a single argument.

> -static void set_special_pids(pid_t session, pid_t pgrp)
> +static void set_special_pids(struct pid *pid)
>  {
>  	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> -	__set_special_pids(session, pgrp);
> +	__set_special_pids(pid);
>  	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -385,7 +386,11 @@ void daemonize(const char *name, ...)
>  	 */
>  	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
>  
> -	set_special_pids(1, 1);
> +	if (current->nsproxy != &init_nsproxy) {
> +		get_nsproxy(&init_nsproxy);
> +		switch_task_namespaces(current, &init_nsproxy);
> +	}

Is there a reason for moving this hunk of code?

I don't see one as set_special_pids does everything with either
struct pid or global pid values.  And attach_pid and detach_pid
don't care.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-26 14:25 [PATCH 2/3] teach set_special_pids() to use struct pid Oleg Nesterov
2007-11-26 15:02 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2007-11-26 18:51 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-11-26 20:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-11-26 21:42     ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m18x4kon6i.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox