From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Molina <tmolina@cox.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels
Date: 24 Oct 2002 02:07:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18z0os1iz.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021021192410.00b4ffb8@pop.gmx.net>
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> writes:
> At 01:58 PM 10/20/2002 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> >On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > At 08:17 AM 10/20/2002 -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> > > >On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Greetings,
> > > > >
> > > > > I hadn't had time to build/test kernels since 2.5.8-pre3. I now find
> > that
> > > > > loadlin doesn't work on my box any more. Is this a known problem? If
> > so,
> > > > > when did it quit working? (loadlin obsolete? other?)
> > > >
> > > >I'm carrying an open problem report from Rene Blokland on this issue.
> > > >What version of the kernel did you try?
> > >
> > > Only 2.5.42.virgin, 2.5.42-mm, 2.5.43-mm and 2.5.44.virgin. Binary search
> > > pending.
> >
> >The report stated the problem was noted with 2.5.4x. One of the
> >developers might want to speak up as to whether finding the exact point of
> >breakage is useful.
>
> 2.5.32 is the breakage point here. I hope someone _else_ can salvage loadlin :)
>
>
> (lions and tigers and bears - oh my GDT!)
Cool, thanks, for the confirmation. Other people are seeing breaking a little
later. Just to clarify. .30 or .31 is the last version that worked and .32
does not?
If it is really the gdt I have some old patches that roughly do the
right thing, and I just need to dust them off.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-24 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-20 12:51 loadlin with 2.5.?? kernels Mike Galbraith
2002-10-20 13:17 ` Thomas Molina
2002-10-20 17:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-20 18:58 ` Thomas Molina
2002-10-21 11:28 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-10-21 17:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-24 8:07 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2002-10-24 8:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-25 12:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-25 13:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-25 22:00 ` robert w hall
2002-10-26 4:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-26 5:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-26 5:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-26 5:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-26 6:32 ` Rene Blokland
2002-10-26 7:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-10-26 9:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-26 10:37 ` robert w hall
2002-10-30 1:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-31 21:24 ` robert w hall
2002-10-26 8:22 ` robert w hall
[not found] <1a9.a96af34.2ae43a18@aol.com>
2002-10-20 17:40 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] <002f01c27c2a$d4c758a0$6400a8c0@mikeg>
2002-10-25 18:42 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m18z0os1iz.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmolina@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox