Re: [PATCH 00/69] faster tree-based sysctl implementation

Eric W. Biederman
2011-05-02T03:26:43Z

Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> writes:

>> For long term maintainability and comprehensibility I think moving
>> sysctl in the direction of a normal filesystem makes a lot of sense.
>
> Ok, I agree that a later redesign of sysctl would suffer if there
> would be a mess regarding registration/unregistration of directories
> and no ownership information/enforcement. I'll see how this can be
> addressed in the next respin of this series.

Thanks.

Eric