From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>,
fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Kexec: Common alloc
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:46:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1acaq94qf.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060412141838.GA5550@in.ibm.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:18:38 -0400")
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 05:33:02PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> Kexec: Common alloc
>>
>> This patch reduces code redundancy by introducing a new function called
>> kimage_common_alloc() which is used to set up image->control_code_page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>
>> ---
>>
>> Applies on top of linux-2.6.17-rc1-git5 + "Kexec: Remove duplicate rimage"
>>
>> kexec.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
>> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- 0004/kernel/kexec.c
>> +++ work/kernel/kexec.c 2006-04-12 16:30:34.000000000 +0900
>> @@ -205,34 +205,36 @@ out:
>>
>> }
>>
>> -static int kimage_normal_alloc(struct kimage **rimage, unsigned long entry,
>> - unsigned long nr_segments,
>> - struct kexec_segment __user *segments)
>> +static int kimage_common_alloc(struct kimage *image)
>> {
>> - int result;
>> - struct kimage *image;
>> -
>> - /* Allocate and initialize a controlling structure */
>> - image = NULL;
>> - result = do_kimage_alloc(&image, entry, nr_segments, segments);
>> - if (result)
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> /*
>> - * Find a location for the control code buffer, and add it
>> + * Find a location for the control code buffer, and add
>> * the vector of segments so that it's pages will also be
>> * counted as destination pages.
>> */
>> - result = -ENOMEM;
>> image->control_code_page = kimage_alloc_control_pages(image,
>> get_order(KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_SIZE));
>> if (!image->control_code_page) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "Could not allocate control_code_buffer\n");
>> - goto out;
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Ok. So effectively call to the the function kimage_alloc_control_pages() and
> its return code handling is being wrapped in another function. This function
> is called at only two places. Not quite convinced that this duplication is
> significant enough that we introduce another function to wrap a function
> call.
Agreed.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-12 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-12 8:33 [PATCH] Kexec: Common alloc Magnus Damm
2006-04-12 14:18 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-04-12 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1acaq94qf.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox