public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com>,
	Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: oops in ioapic_write_entry
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:19:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1bp9jdvic.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C58ADB2.8060702@kernel.org> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Tue\, 03 Aug 2010 17\:00\:50 -0700")

Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:

> On 08/03/2010 02:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:
>> 
>>> On 08/03/2010 04:08 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For the common case I think we still do the right thing, even now, for
>>>> these broken bios tables.  There is likely an uncommon case for which
>>>> something like your shared_legacy_irq deserves to be used, especially
>>>> at it preserves our well tested historical behavior.
>>>
>>> Dave, Irnna, Gary:
>>>
>>> can you check this patch on your systems?
>>>
>>> [PATCH] x86: check if apic/pin is shared with legacy one
>>>
>>> fix system that external device that have io apic on apic0/pin(0-15)
>> 
>> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>> 
>> Your patch addresses what appears to be a theoretical issue, caused by
>> a BIOS bug.  So far you have not presented a credible scenario where
>> this would affect anything in real life except the user visible irq
>> number.
>> 
>> Will you please stop, think, and describe what is going on clearly
>> and how you expect this patch to affect anything, and please stop
>> selling this patch as the solution to all of the world's ills.  You
>> are being sloppy and wasting everyone's time.
>
> That is real problem in pin_2_irq()
>
> Nvidia chipset system with legacy bios will have problem when user try to boot with acpi is disabled.
> LinuxBIOS should be ok, already have external devices to use pin above 15.

The Nvidia chipset will have what problem?

> Also your patch does cause kernel crash when acpi is disabled in virtualbox even there
> could be BIOS problem there.
> kernel before your patch does work in that conf.

What is the kernel crash?

I believe you have told me earlier that the problems you see with 2.6.35 are
roughly, while those setups work with 2.3.34?

>  cause kernel with acpi crash in virtual box.
> 
> [    5.536000] querying PCI -> IRQ mapping bus:0, slot:11, pin:0.
> [    5.540000] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.0: can't find IRQ for PCI INT A; probably buggy MP table
> [
> 
> and on kvm it got:
> [    4.352280] e1000: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.21-k6-NAPI
> [    4.356012] e1000: Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
> [    4.360120] querying PCI -> IRQ mapping bus:0, slot:3, pin:0.
> [    4.364006] PCI BIOS passed nonexistent PCI bus 0!
> [    4.368007] e1000 0000:00:03.0: can't find IRQ for PCI INT A; probably buggy MP table
> [    4.372049] e1000 0000:00:03.0: setting latency timer to 64


Can you send out boot log with "debug apic=debug pci=routeirq" for the
working 2.6.34, the failing 2.6.35, and your .config?

With a little luck that will be enough to allow us to pinpoint the
problem case.

Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-04  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-02  5:28 oops in ioapic_write_entry Dave Airlie
2010-08-02  6:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-02 23:17   ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-03  1:32     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  1:34       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  3:13         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03  7:19           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  8:00             ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03  8:04               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  8:56                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03  9:01                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  9:15                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03  9:36                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 11:08                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 19:45                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 20:02                             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 21:38                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 23:12                               ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-04  0:00                               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-04  1:19                                 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-08-04  7:33                               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-04  8:59                               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-04  9:26                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-04 12:12                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-04 19:22                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-04 20:34                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-04 22:06                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  8:00             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03  8:27               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03  3:26     ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]       ` <AANLkTi=qtLkY0=h77=EVL+y1q41b_cMBODvL4Hu6A6wL@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-03  6:00         ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1bp9jdvic.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox