From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Iranna D Ankad <iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: oops in ioapic_write_entry
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:19:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1bp9jdvic.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C58ADB2.8060702@kernel.org> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Tue\, 03 Aug 2010 17\:00\:50 -0700")
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:
> On 08/03/2010 02:38 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 08/03/2010 04:08 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For the common case I think we still do the right thing, even now, for
>>>> these broken bios tables. There is likely an uncommon case for which
>>>> something like your shared_legacy_irq deserves to be used, especially
>>>> at it preserves our well tested historical behavior.
>>>
>>> Dave, Irnna, Gary:
>>>
>>> can you check this patch on your systems?
>>>
>>> [PATCH] x86: check if apic/pin is shared with legacy one
>>>
>>> fix system that external device that have io apic on apic0/pin(0-15)
>>
>> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>>
>> Your patch addresses what appears to be a theoretical issue, caused by
>> a BIOS bug. So far you have not presented a credible scenario where
>> this would affect anything in real life except the user visible irq
>> number.
>>
>> Will you please stop, think, and describe what is going on clearly
>> and how you expect this patch to affect anything, and please stop
>> selling this patch as the solution to all of the world's ills. You
>> are being sloppy and wasting everyone's time.
>
> That is real problem in pin_2_irq()
>
> Nvidia chipset system with legacy bios will have problem when user try to boot with acpi is disabled.
> LinuxBIOS should be ok, already have external devices to use pin above 15.
The Nvidia chipset will have what problem?
> Also your patch does cause kernel crash when acpi is disabled in virtualbox even there
> could be BIOS problem there.
> kernel before your patch does work in that conf.
What is the kernel crash?
I believe you have told me earlier that the problems you see with 2.6.35 are
roughly, while those setups work with 2.3.34?
> cause kernel with acpi crash in virtual box.
>
> [ 5.536000] querying PCI -> IRQ mapping bus:0, slot:11, pin:0.
> [ 5.540000] ehci_hcd 0000:00:0b.0: can't find IRQ for PCI INT A; probably buggy MP table
> [
>
> and on kvm it got:
> [ 4.352280] e1000: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.21-k6-NAPI
> [ 4.356012] e1000: Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
> [ 4.360120] querying PCI -> IRQ mapping bus:0, slot:3, pin:0.
> [ 4.364006] PCI BIOS passed nonexistent PCI bus 0!
> [ 4.368007] e1000 0000:00:03.0: can't find IRQ for PCI INT A; probably buggy MP table
> [ 4.372049] e1000 0000:00:03.0: setting latency timer to 64
Can you send out boot log with "debug apic=debug pci=routeirq" for the
working 2.6.34, the failing 2.6.35, and your .config?
With a little luck that will be enough to allow us to pinpoint the
problem case.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-02 5:28 oops in ioapic_write_entry Dave Airlie
2010-08-02 6:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-02 23:17 ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-03 1:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 1:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 3:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 7:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 8:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 8:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 8:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 9:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 9:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 9:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 11:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 20:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 21:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 23:12 ` Dave Airlie
2010-08-04 0:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-04 1:19 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-08-04 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-04 8:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-04 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-08-04 12:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-04 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-04 20:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-04 22:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 8:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-08-03 8:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-08-03 3:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=qtLkY0=h77=EVL+y1q41b_cMBODvL4Hu6A6wL@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-03 6:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1bp9jdvic.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox