Re: Security question: "Text file busy" overwriting executables but

Oliver Xymoron
2001-10-05T18:50:07Z

On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Horst von Brand wrote:
>
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> said:
> > > On 5 Oct 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Currently checking to see if the file is executable looks good
> > > > enough.
> > >
> > > [ executable by the user in question, not just anybody ]
> > >
> > > Yes, I suspect it is.
> >
> > Who is "user in question"? It is quite legal (if strange) to have a file
> > user A can modify, but not execute, while B can execute it.
>
> The "user in question" being the one that actually does the
> mmap(MAP_DENYWRITE). If _he_ can execute the file, that would be
> reason enough to think that he can deny others from writing to it while he
> has it mapped..

This violates principle of least surprise. It _should_ be harmless for an
admin to mark /var/log/utmp +x, yes? Stupid, but harmless. Now suppose it
lives on VFAT...

--
"Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."