public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] let setup_irq reenable a shared irq
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:19:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1d4o7kpme.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804281640220.3261@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:10:30 +0200 (CEST)")

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
 >
> Subject: genirq: reenable a nobody cared disabled irq when a new driver arrives
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:01:56 +0200
>
> Uwe Kleine-Koenig has some strange hardware where one of the shared
> interrupts can be asserted during boot before the appropriate driver
> loads. Requesting the shared irq line from another driver results in a
> spurious interrupt storm which finally disables the interrupt line.
>
> I have seen similar behaviour on resume before (the hardware does not
> work anymore so I can not verify) and this spurious irq issue is
> raised on a regular base in bugreports.

This case also happens on a regular basis in kdump kernels where we
deliberately don't shutdown the hardware before starting the new kernel.
This patch should reduce the need for using irqpoll in that situation
by a small amount.

> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ typedef	void (*irq_flow_handler_t)(unsig
>  #define IRQ_WAKEUP 0x00100000 /* IRQ triggers system wakeup */
>  #define IRQ_MOVE_PENDING 0x00200000 /* need to re-target IRQ destination */
>  #define IRQ_NO_BALANCING 0x00400000 /* IRQ is excluded from balancing */
> +#define IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED 0x00400000 /* IRQ was disabled by the spurious trap */

Looks like a duplicate define here. Don't you want:
+#define IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED 0x00800000 /* IRQ was disabled by the spurious trap */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-30 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-28 11:12 [PATCH] let setup_irq reenable a shared irq Uwe Kleine-König
2008-04-28 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 14:11   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-04-28 16:10     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-29 13:08       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-04-29 16:23         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-30 21:19       ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-04-30 21:36         ` Thomas Gleixner
     [not found] <1209557398-8228-1-git-send-email-Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com>
2008-04-30 12:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-30 12:38   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-30 12:43     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1d4o7kpme.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@digi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox