From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755259Ab2AXIrG (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:47:06 -0500 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:52409 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754315Ab2AXIrE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 03:47:04 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Pavel Emelyanov , Serge Hallyn , Kees Cook , Tejun Heo , Andrew Vagin , Alexey Dobriyan , KOSAKI Motohiro , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Glauber Costa , Andi Kleen , Matt Helsley , Pekka Enberg , Eric Dumazet , Vasiliy Kulikov , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] [RFC] syscalls, x86: Add __NR_kcmp syscall v4 References: <20120123142036.025893883@openvz.org> <20120123142436.258631438@openvz.org> <20120124111655.b29264d2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20120124064719.GA29735@moon> <4F1E57F3.6020607@zytor.com> <20120124071716.GC29735@moon> <20120124162031.a3956058.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:49:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20120124162031.a3956058.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> (KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki's message of "Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:20:31 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=98.207.153.68;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+atukDsuTJEOSLZI8446WM4d4gQse+uU8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 98.207.153.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on in01.mta.xmission.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki writes: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:17:16 +0400 > Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:04:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> > On 01/23/2012 10:47 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Why under /arch ? >> > >> >> > > >> > > Hi Kame, >> > > >> > > because I've tested it under x86 only. Once someone >> > > confirm it's needed on some else arch and does work >> > > as expected -- it wont be a problem to make it system >> > > wide. Until then -- I think better to stick with >> > > at least tested case. >> > > ... >> > >> > That's not a reason to put it in arch/ ... that's possibly a reason to >> > not map the system call on other architectures yet. >> > >> >> Where it should live then? In kernel/ or mm/ ? >> > > kernel/checkpoint_restart ? > > gathering related changes to a directory may help developpers joins later.... > To me, this makes seeing git log easy ;) kernel/ The dominant use may be checkpoint restart but the code is not at all checkpoint restart specific. Eric