From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932489Ab0IXROR (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:14:17 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:40455 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754147Ab0IXROQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:14:16 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Hans J. Koch" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner References: <20100917205946.GF2522@local> <20100924104555.GC1819@silverbox.local> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:14:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100924104555.GC1819@silverbox.local> (Hans J. Koch's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:45:55 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=98.207.157.188;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 98.207.157.188 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;"Hans J. Koch" X-Spam-Relay-Country: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] uio hotplug support X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:31:04 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Hans J. Koch" writes: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:19:59AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Implement the ability to hotunplug a uio device while file handles >> are still open without crashing. > > Could you please create patches that apply on top of your already > accepted UIO changes? That is what the patches I sent should be. My apologies if I had not made that clear. Certainly these patches were built against my previous changes, on top of 2.6.36-rc4. Are you having problems? If necessary I can grab Greg's tree can rebase my patches onto it. Eric