From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030338AbWGUAVP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:21:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030419AbWGUAVP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:21:15 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:33457 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030338AbWGUAVO (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:21:14 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Dan Carpenter" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: shut down from CPU 0 [regression] References: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:20:28 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Dan Carpenter's message of "Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:52:16 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Dan Carpenter" writes: > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6660316cb7a1a2c59a73a52870490c0f782f45c1 > > Even though you should be able to call ACPI power down from either > CPU, I've seen some BIOSes that implement it wrong. That's why the > code was there. > For example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189052 I don't understand the complaint we should be forcing the action to happen on the boot cpu from another place in the code. Eric