From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:22:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:22:09 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:8009 "EHLO flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:22:06 -0400 To: landley@webofficenow.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Microsoft and Xenix. In-Reply-To: <01062310075401.00696@localhost.localdomain> <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 24 Jun 2001 21:17:29 -0600 In-Reply-To: <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob Landley writes: > On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Rob Landley writes: > > > Ummm... GEM was the Geos stuff? (Yeah I remember it, I haven't > > > researched it yet though...) > > > > GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe. > > Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity. > > Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt never > tried its gui.) Actually I believe GEM predates DR-DOS, and except for being made by the same company I don't think they were ever related. Eric