From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755169AbYIWSfq (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:35:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752339AbYIWSfi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:35:38 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:35436 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751721AbYIWSfh (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:35:37 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Benjamin Thery Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" , Al Viro References: <48D7AC44.6050208@bull.net> <20080922153455.GA6238@kroah.com> <48D8FC1E.6000601@bull.net> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:23:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <48D8FC1E.6000601@bull.net> (Benjamin Thery's message of "Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:24:30 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=mx04.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=24.130.11.59;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: benjamin.thery@bull.net, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, serue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Benjamin Thery X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0069] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:40:56 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx04.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Benjamin Thery writes: > > Oh. > It's a pity Al couldn't re-review them before. We've already lost a lot > of time with this patchset and it's blocking easier testing of network > namespaces (right now, with a mainline kernel, we have to disable sysfs > to build network namespaces). I am confident that we have a good base with these patches and the rest of the work can be done incrementally on top of them if any issues turn up. Al recent rework of sysctl has a very similar structure. > Thanks anyway. It's a good step to have it in a tree. Yes. That should prevent other changes out there from surprising us. Eric