public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>,
	video4linux-list@redhat.com,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	kraxel@bytesex.org, Containers@lists.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: saa7134-tvaudio.c
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:39:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k64rf9om.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060829143902.a6aa2712.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:39:02 -0700")

Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:

> So in general, yes, the driver should be converted to the kthread API -
> this is a requirement for virtualisation, but I forget why, and that's the
> "standard" way of doing it.

With the kthread api new kernel threads are started as children of keventd
in well defined circumstances.  If you don't do this kernel threads
can wind up sharing weird parts of a parent process's resources and
locking resources in the kernel long past the time when they are
actually used by anything a user space process can kill.

We have actually witnessed this problem with the kernels filesystem mount
namespace.  Mostly daemonize in the kernel unshares everything that
could be a problem but the problem is sufficiently subtle it makes
more sense to the change kernel threads.  So these weird and subtle
dependencies go away.

So in essence the container work needs the new kthread api for the
same reasons everyone else does it is just more pronounced in that
case.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-29 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-29 21:15 [PATCH] kthread: saa7134-tvaudio.c Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2006-08-29 21:22 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-29 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-29 22:39   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-08-30 12:39     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-30 14:07       ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-08-30 15:43         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-30 16:18           ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-08-30 16:35             ` [Devel] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-30 16:38             ` Kir Kolyshkin
2006-08-30 16:30   ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-08-30 16:49     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-30 17:36       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2006-08-31  1:02         ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2006-08-31  1:05         ` [PATCH] kthread: tvaudio.c Sukadev Bhattiprolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1k64rf9om.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=Containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox