From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
pavel@suse.cz, len.brown@intel.com, drzeus-list@drzeus.cx,
acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ncunningham@cyclades.com,
masouds@masoud.ir, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] suspend: Cleanup calling of power off methods.
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:08:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ll1qcmzr.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050921104615.2e8dd7d5.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:46:15 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> I'm doin OK.
Good to hear.
> Patch volume isn't a problem wrt the simple mechanics of handling them.
> The problem we have at present is lack of patch reviewing bandwidth. I'll
> be tightening things up in that area. Relatively few developers seem to
> have the stomach to do a line-by-line through large patches, and it would
> be nice to refocus people a bit on that. Christoph's work is hugely
> appreciated, thanks.
>
> Famous last words, but the actual patch volume _has_ to drop off one day.
> In fact there doesn't seem to much happening out there wrt 2.6.15.
Due to changes coming through git or that there will simply be fewer
things that need to be patched?
As for 2.6.15 I know I have patches in the queue that I intend to send
out later this week, which probably count. I wonder if other developers
are similar.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-21 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 18:23 reboot vs poweroff Brown, Len
2005-09-02 4:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-10 21:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-11 8:43 ` Meelis Roos
2005-09-11 8:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-20 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] reboot: Comment and factor the main reboot functions Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-20 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] suspend: Cleanup calling of power off methods Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-20 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-21 2:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-21 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-21 13:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-21 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-21 17:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-21 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-21 17:36 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-09-21 18:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-21 19:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-09-21 18:35 ` Diego Calleja
2005-09-21 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-21 19:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-26 12:09 ` Diego Calleja
2005-09-26 13:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-21 20:16 ` Diego Calleja
2005-09-21 19:43 ` Russell King
2005-09-21 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-22 7:15 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-09-22 8:10 ` [ACPI] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-22 9:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-09-22 9:38 ` Russell King
2005-09-22 10:54 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-09-21 17:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-21 18:08 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2005-09-21 18:24 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1ll1qcmzr.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masouds@masoud.ir \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox