From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: devel@openvz.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct file leakage
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:56:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1odvxptbb.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B2185F.1060402@sw.ru> (Kirill Korotaev's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:05:35 +0400")
Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> writes:
> Hello!
>
> Andrew, this is a patch from Alexey Kuznetsov for 2.6.16.
> I believe 2.6.17 still has this leak.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 2.6.16 leaks like hell. While testing, I found massive leakage
> (reproduced in openvz) in:
>
> *filp
> *size-4096
>
> And 1 object leaks in
> *size-32
> *size-64
> *size-128
>
>
> It is the fix for the first one. filp leaks in the bowels
> of namei.c.
>
> Seems, size-4096 is file table leaking in expand_fdtables.
>
> I have no idea what are the rest and why they show only
> accompaniing another leaks. Some debugging structs?
Or something the intent or the filp holds a reference to?
Looks like this has been broken since 834f2a4a1554dc5b2598038b3fe8703defcbe467
about 9 months ago.
The patch looks sane.
Trond did you just miss this case?
> Signed-Off-By: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
> CC: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
>
> --- linux-2.6.16-w/fs/namei.c 2006-07-10 11:43:11.000000000 +0400
> +++ linux-2.6.16/fs/namei.c 2006-07-10 11:53:36.000000000 +0400
> @@ -1774,8 +1774,15 @@ do_link:
> if (error)
> goto exit_dput;
> error = __do_follow_link(&path, nd);
> - if (error)
> + if (error) {
> + /* Does someone understand code flow here? Or it is only
> + * me so stupid? Anathema to whoever designed this non-sense
> + * with "intent.open".
> + */
> + if (!IS_ERR(nd->intent.open.file))
> + release_open_intent(nd);
> return error;
> + }
> nd->flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
> if (nd->last_type == LAST_BIND)
> goto ok;
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 9:05 [PATCH] struct file leakage Kirill Korotaev
2006-07-10 10:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-10 10:16 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-11 12:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-07-11 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-12 0:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-07-10 11:56 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-10 9:05 Kirill Korotaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1odvxptbb.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox