From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756537Ab0EUHoG (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 03:44:06 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:41529 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753517Ab0EUHoE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 03:44:04 -0400 To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, greg@kroah.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20100521162134.6b6326bd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100520.235008.97331614.davem@davemloft.net> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 00:43:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100520.235008.97331614.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu\, 20 May 2010 23\:50\:08 -0700 \(PDT\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.188.5.249;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.188.5.249 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;David Miller X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -3.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral * 0.4 UNTRUSTED_Relay Comes from a non-trusted relay Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 23:46:22 -0700 > >> It looks right, except perhaps the RPS code looks like it will cause a >> build failure with sysfs disabled, but that has nothing to do with your >> changes. > > CONFIG_RPS depends upon CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_SYSFS, so no that build > failure is not possible. That's the bit I'm missing. My apologies if I caused any unnecessary worry. Eric