From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark timer_stats as incompatible with multiple pid namespaces
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:29:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1prxaqo62.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071213202621.GC25130@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:26:21 +0100")
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
>> > the problem is, this interface stores historic PIDs too - i.e. PIDs
>> > of tasks that might have exited already.
>>
>> Well struct pid * works in that case if you grab the reference to it.
>
> but the display of the stats might happen much later. The point of this
> API is to save pid+comm, which gives users a good idea about what caused
> the events in the past - without having to pin any resource of that
> task.
Likewise struct pid is designed not to be a problem if pinned. It is a
little heavier then it used to be with the addition of pid namespace
support but not much. And if it is to heavy struct pid needs to be
fixed.
Holding the struct pid very much does not pin the task struct, and it
shouldn't pin any other resources. I agree 64bytes or so is a bit
more to pin then 4 bytes but it really isn't a lot.
>> {
>> timer->start_site = NULL;
>> + pit_pid(timer->start_pid);
>> + timer->start_pid = NULL;
>
> s/pit/put, right?
Yes. Clearly I haven't tested it yet.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-12 23:10 [PATCH] Mark timer_stats as incompatible with multiple pid namespaces Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-13 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 11:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-13 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 17:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-13 20:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 21:29 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-12-13 21:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-13 21:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1prxaqo62.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox