From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lcm@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered inactive device IRQ interrruption
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:29:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1r601fg9l.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408210735.GD11159@us.ibm.com> (Gary Hade's message of "Wed\, 8 Apr 2009 14\:07\:35 -0700")
Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Impact: Eliminates a race that can leave the system in an
> unusable state
>
> During rapid offlining of multiple CPUs there is a chance
> that an IRQ affinity move destination CPU will be offlined
> before the IRQ affinity move initiated during the offlining
> of a previous CPU completes. This can happen when the device
> is not very active and thus fails to generate the IRQ that is
> needed to complete the IRQ affinity move before the move
> destination CPU is offlined. When this happens there is an
> -EBUSY return from __assign_irq_vector() during the offlining
> of the IRQ move destination CPU which prevents initiation of
> a new IRQ affinity move operation to an online CPU. This
> leaves the IRQ affinity set to an offlined CPU.
>
> I have been able to reproduce the problem on some of our
> systems using the following script. When the system is idle
> the problem often reproduces during the first CPU offlining
> sequence.
You appear to be focusing on the IBM x460 and x3835. Can you describe
what kind of interrupt setup you are running.
You may be the first person to actually hit the problems with cpu offlining
and irq migration that have theoretically been present for a long.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-10 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 21:07 [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered inactive device IRQ interrruption Gary Hade
2009-04-08 22:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-08 23:37 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-08 23:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-08 23:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-09 19:17 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-09 22:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-10 0:53 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-10 1:29 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-04-10 20:09 ` Gary Hade
2009-04-10 22:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11 7:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-11 7:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-11 11:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-13 17:41 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-13 18:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-13 22:20 ` [PATCH] irq, x86: Remove IRQ_DISABLED check in process context IRQ move Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-14 1:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-14 14:06 ` [tip:irq/urgent] x86, irq: " tip-bot for Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered inactive device IRQ interrruption Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-13 21:09 ` Gary Hade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1r601fg9l.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox