Re: [PATCH] [25/98] x86, AMD: Fix APIC timer erratum 400 affecting K8 Rev.A-E processors

Boris Ostrovsky
2011-07-27T16:06:38Z

On 07/27/11 11:42, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Andi, this patch is unnecessary.
>>
>> It (as well as 328935e6348c6a7cb34798a68c326f4b8372e68a and
>> 14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d) is superseded by
>> e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 upstream
>
> Is it obsolete in 2.6.35 too?

Yes.

>
> So what should I do? Drop this one and merge some other?
> Or just drop?

Please drop it (and skip the other two that I mentioned above) and apply
e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470.

>
> If yes why do the other ones not have Cc: stable marks?

That was a mistake on my part, sorry about this.

-boris