public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:31:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1slq2pyyy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060228194525.0faebaaa.pj@sgi.com> (Paul Jackson's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:45:25 -0800")

Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> writes:

>> -rc5-mm1 appears to be a trainwreck.  It's a bit of a mystery - I've tried
>> several further configs and it all works swimmingly.
>
> Getting closer.
>
> Without the patches:
>
>     proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely.patch
>     proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-git-nfs-fix.patch
>     proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix.patch

That definitely makes sense if there is a reference counting bug
somewhere.

What is also possible but scary is that I don't have a reference
counting bug and something else is wrong with process management,
and by holding a much lighter grasp on the tasks in /proc
I have managed to make the bug much easier to trigger.

Hmm.  I think I can see at least one reference counting bug..
Unfortunately it is in the wrong direction.

> With these patches, it still boots, and looks fine ... until
> I fire up my SGI specific application, and then it dies.
> Once it died with some complaint (lost now) from a swap
> daemon.  This latest time, it died with just:
>
>   Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!

Ouch.

> So I think the above 3 patches make it easy for user space
> to kill the kernel.

The intent was the opposite...  But until the bugs get out...

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-01  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200603010120.k211KqVP009559@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-03-01  2:18 ` + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  2:36   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01  3:45     ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  4:10       ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  5:05         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01  5:25           ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  6:11             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01  6:15               ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01  7:20             ` [PATCH] proc: Reference couting fix Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01  7:26             ` [PATCH] proc: task_mmu bug fix Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01  7:46               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 12:49                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 13:14                   ` Hugh Dickins
2006-03-01 13:15                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-01 18:33                 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  7:48             ` + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  8:26               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01  8:39                 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01  9:53                 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:02                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 10:14                     ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:11                   ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:31                     ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 19:21                   ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 20:58                     ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 21:30                       ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 22:26                         ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 22:50                           ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 23:20                             ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:40                               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02  0:10                                 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02  0:35                                   ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:10                           ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:40                             ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02  4:20                               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02  6:14                                 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02  7:42                                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 19:12                                     ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 21:52                                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03  6:33                                         ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-03  6:44                                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01  4:31       ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-03-01  4:58         ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1slq2pyyy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox